Leo Donofrio and Stephen Pidgeon have joined forces to expose the FRAUD BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA

Posted in Leo Donofrio And Steve Pidgeon Vs Obama with tags on December 9, 2009 by citizenquo

Leo and Steve Meet BO At The Chrysler Waterloo

Leo Donofrio deleted his blog suddenly and people were thinking Leo had given up. Today we find out Leo has not given up exposing the FRAUD obama. Stephen pidgeon another excellent lawyer is also joining forces with Leo to file two new court cases. The “dream team” of Leo and Stephen representing Chrysler dealers forced to close by obama under the troubled asset relief program will be used to challenge the FRAUD obama in US bankruptcy court.

In addition to a bankruptcy court challenge, a “quo warranto” case is being filed in Washington, D.C., demanding to know by what authority administration officials set up the financial arrangements with Chrysler and handed out taxpayer money. The “quo warranto” case being filed in Washington, D.C., is demanding to know by what authority administration officials set up the financial arrangements with Chrysler and handed out taxpayer money.

Stephen Pidgeon said clients in the case are former Chrysler dealers who lost their businesses as part of the “restructuring” of the automobile company. They have been damaged with the loss of their businesses, and the case alleges the Obama administration, through its use of TARP money, influenced Chrysler’s outcome. The goal is “to get them restored,” he said, and “put them back where they were before their contracts were rejected.”

“Our clients are not in this action as ‘birthers,'” he said, citing a term used for people who question Obama’s constitutional eligibility. “Our clients are here to seek redress for wrongs.”

Leo Donofrio said the core issue is the disbursement of TARP funds to the auto maker that were intended to help banks and financial institutions. The previous Treasury secretary had indicated such expenditures were not appropriate, and, in fact, a congressional effort to authorize the expenditures failed.

As part of the demand for information about the authority used, Donofrio confirmed, there will be questions about Obama’s eligibility to be president. Leo Donofrio contends that since by Obama’s own admission his father never was a U.S. citizen, Obama was born a dual citizen. The framers of the Constitution, he argues, did not consider a dual citizen to be a “natural born citizen” as required for the presidency.

The burden, then, would shift to Obama and his administration officials to document their constitutional authority for their decisions and their handling of taxpayer money.

If the president cannot document his eligibility to occupy the Oval Office, his presidential task force had no authority to act at all, Leo’s and Steve’s case contends.

The case may open doors that have been closed in other disputes over Obama’s eligibility. Most previous cases, at one point or another, have been dismissed because the plaintiffs do not have “standing” – they have not suffered direct injury for which they have a reasonable expectation of seeking redress.

In the case of the dealers, they have suffered financial loss
because of circumstances that developed with the government’s intervention in the auto industry.

Quo warranto applies not just to eligibility but to the “exercise” of authority through public office. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals already has described as “interesting and unresolved” some of the questions raised in a related case that did not involve the dealers. In that case, once again, the appellants did not have “standing.”

“The Chrysler dealers have the requisite injury – loss of their franchises – to meet the standing requirements,”

The formal paperwork in the filings is expected to be submitted to the courts within days on a motion to reconsider the bankruptcy court’s decisions and the quo warranto pertaining to the authority of Obama and his appointees.

Leo and Steve will bring two counts under 3501, eligibility and illegal use of Government funds. The second count refers to the use of TARP funds to facilitate the Chrysler Bankruptcy sale.

Donofrio and Pidgeon also plan a third quo warranto count based upon 16-3521(2) of the quo warranto statute. The actions taken by the government were an illegal exercise of corporate authority. The government has acted as a political agent (acting as board of directors) against corporations using taxpayer money to restructure the auto industry under their vision.

……………………………………………………………………………..
I knew Leo Donofrio was a “game changer”. Stephen Pidgeon is also a “game changer”. Of all the lawyers who could expose the FRAUD obama these two are the best. Leo and Steve have now joined forces to expose the imposter obama. Obama’s got to be worried about this.

Leo Donofrio and Stephen Pidgeon have joined forces to assemble a case challenging in U.S. bankruptcy court the federal government’s use of Troubled Asset Relief Program funds to bail out Chrysler and in doing so may have created a scenario that finally will bring to a head the issue of Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president.

The “stimulus matrix” is about to be exposed by Leo and Steve. I really feel good about this. I guess I even feel beter than EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson when she could not wait to announce the The Environmental Protection Agency is taking steps to regulate greenhouse gases including co2.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Closed Chrysler dealers to drive Obama’s eligibility

Former Chrysler dealers fight back using the Quo Warranto

Cars, Quo Warranto, and Obama

Stephen Pidgeon

The Truth

Quo Warranto Legal Brief Part 1 Explained by Leo Donofrio

Quo Warranto Legal Brief Part 2 Explained By Leo Donofrio

Quo Warranto Legal Brief Part 3 Explained By Leo Donofrio

Misconceptions About Quo Warranto Explained By Leo Donofrio
……………………………………………………………………………..

In Leo Donofrio’s last blog post, “The Truth”, he left us all a clue:

“Emotional pleas do not sway federal courts. Only the cold hard force of legal will does.

Patience. Attention to detail. Strategy. Planning. Honesty. Integrity. Respect for the law. Respect for the process. Thorough research. And most important – genuine injuries different than those suffered by the public at large.”

“By now it should be clear that federal standing and political question doctrine issues will not yield to exotic conceptual legal theories. As predicted, the courts will not bend to anyone that precedent does not bestow judicial invitation upon. After the electoral college certified Obama, I predicted every eligibility law suit pending against him would fail on procedural grounds unless brought via the DC District Court under the the DC quo warranto statute.”

Judicial invitation has been visited upon chrysler and Leo Donofrio will bend the courts to the precedent that will be bestowed upon barack obama’s conviction in Dc Court as a FRAUD through Quo Warranto. I say, GOD’S SPEED to Leo and Steven in their quest for Chrysler and the American People. THE GAME CHANGER IS BACK IN THE GAME!

This is the single most serious case to be brought against The Obama Administration and the President himself to date.

Advertisements

Leo Donofrio – Quo Warranto expanded

Posted in Uncategorized with tags on December 6, 2009 by citizenquo

Leo Donofrio – Quo Warranto expanded

Leo has deleted his expanded information about quo warranto from his blog. It is also on scribd.com I am building a database of Leo’s good work for study and reference.

Bulletin:

Leo Is Back In A BIG Way Along With Steven Pidgeon. The Game Changer Is Still Working For America.

Leo Donofrio And Stephen Pidgeo Will File A Quo Warranto In DC Court Representing Chrysler. WOW!

Leo Donofrio – Quo Warranto expanded

View this document on Scribd

The Stimulus Matrix And Chrysler

Posted in Leo Donofrio's Quest with tags , , on December 5, 2009 by citizenquo

Correction:

Leo Donofrio Has Punted The Quo Warranto “Ball” Into The DC Court! WOW! The Gane changer is back!

Leo Donofrio And Steve Pidgeon Are Representing Chrysler And Will File A Quo Warranto In DC Court Along With A Lawsuit In Bankruptcy. Court WOW!!!

The film describes the near future in which reality as perceived by humans is actually the “Obama Stimulus Matrix”: a simulated reality created by the sentient liberal political machines in order to pacify and subdue the human population, while their bodies’ heat and electrical activity are used as an tax source. Upon learning this, citizen lawyer “Leo” is drawn into a rebellion against the  thug political Chicago machine, involving other people reading his blog “naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com” who have been freed from the “dream world” and into reality. The film contains many references to the cyberpunk and hacker subcultures; philosophical and religious ideas; and homages to Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, Hong Kong action cinema, Spaghetti Westerns, dystopian fiction, and Japanese animation.

The future is now. Reality as preceived by many is actually the “State Run Media” matrix. The “stimulus” or “matrix” is a simulated reality created by the sentient machine of ie, liberal politicians and the state run mass media, in order to pacify and subdue the American population, while their bodies heat and electrical activity are used as a tax base for future matrix or “stimulus” expansion. Upon learning this, citizen lawyer, “Leo” was drawn into a rebellion against the liberal machines, involving other people who have read “Leo’s” blog and have been freed from the “dream world” into the reality of what a natural born citizen is and what obama is not.

Plot

Citizen lawyer Leo D. Donofrio leads a secret life as a poker player under the alias “Leo”, and wishes to learn the answer to the question, “What is the Stimulus Matrix?” Cryptic messages appearing on his computer monitor and encounters with three sinister agents lead him to a group led by the mysterious underground hacker and blogger Mr X, a man who offers him the chance to learn the truth about the Stimulus Matrix: swallow a red pill and learn the truth or swallow a blue pill and return to the world as he knows it. Leo accepts by swallowing the offered red pill, and subsequently finds himself on a concert stage, his body connected by wires and tubes to a vast mechanical tower covered with identical pods. The connections are severed, and he is rescued by Mr X and taken aboard his yacht, the Nebuchadnezzar. Leo’s neglected physical body is restored, and Mr X explains the situation.

Mr X informs Leo that the year is not 1999, but estimated to be closer to 2009, and that humanity is fighting a war against the thug liberal machine created in the early 21st century. The sky is not covered with greenhouse gases created by the humans in an attempt to cut off the machines’ supply of solar power. Global warming is a myth created by the liberal machine to tap into the vast tax base of unsuspecting Americans. The liberal machines responded by using human beings as their tax source in conjunction with the “state Run Media” later taxing countless people in ways not imagined and harvesting their bioelectrical energy and body heat to produce a vast new tax base to fund obama socialism.

The world which Leo has inhabited since birth is the Obama Stimulus Matrix, an illusory simulated stimulus reality construct of the world as it was in 2009 developed by the thug  liberal machine to keep the human population docile in their captivity and insure continued election by liberal socialists. Mr X and his crew are a group of free humans who blog and “unplug” others from the Stimulus Matrix and recruit them to their resistance against the machines. The “crew” produces various blogs and posts within the Matrix explaining that barack obama is not a natural born citizen but is a fraud. They are able to use their understanding of its nature to bend the laws of propaganda within the stimulus simulation, giving them superhuman abilities. Mr X believes that Leo is “the One”, a man prophesied to end the fruad presidency of barack obama through his limitless control over the Matrix using bloggers to defeat liberal lies.

Leo is trained to become a leader of the blog group. A socket in the back of Neo’s skull, formerly used to connect him to the Stimulus Matrix, allows knowledge to be uploaded directly into his mind. In this way, he learns numerous legal disciplines, and demonstrates his legal skills by sparring with Mr X in a virtual reality “construct” environment similar to the Stimulus Matrix, impressing the blog crew with his speed and knowlege. Further training introduces Leo to the key dangers in the Stimulus Matrix itself. Injuries suffered there are reflected in the real world; if he is killed in the Matrix, his physical body will also die. He is warned of the presence of IRS Agents, fast and powerful liberal sentient computer programs with the ability to take over the virtual body of anyone still directly connected to the Stimulus Matrix, whose purpose is to seek out and eliminate any threats to the stimulus simulation. Mr X is confident that once Leo fully understands his own abilities as “the One”, barack obama will be no match for him.

The blog group enters the Stimulus Matrix and takes Leo to meet the Oracle, aka Sarah Palin, the woman who has predicted the eventual emergence of the One. She tells Leo that he has “the gift” of manipulating the Stimulus Matrix, but that he is waiting for something, possibly his next life. From her comments, Leo deduces that he is not the One. She adds that Mr X believes in Leo so blindly that he will sacrifice his life to save him.

Returning to the blog which serves as a safe “exit” from the Matrix, the group is ambushed by Agents and SWAT teams. Agent Smith corners Leo but Mr X pins him down and gives everyone the order to get out. Mr X allows himself to be captured so that Leo and the others can escape. They later learn that they were betrayed by a crew-member who preferred his old life of ignorance over the real world’s hardships and therefore made a deal with the IRS Agents to give them Mr X in exchange for a permanent return to the Stimulus Matrix. The crew-member is defeated but not before his betrayal leads to the deaths of all crew-members except Leo, TerryK, Birther, and Mr X, who is imprisoned in a government building within the Stimulus Matrix. The IRS Agents attempt to gain information from him regarding access codes to the mainframe of blogspot.com, the unplugged humans’ subterranean refuge in the real world. Leo and TerryK return to the Stimulus Matrix and storm the building to rescue their leader. Leo becomes more confident and familiar with manipulating the Stimulus Matrix, ultimately dodging legal bullets fired at him by an IRS Agent. Mr X and TerryK use a subway station telephone to exit the Stimulus Matrix, but before Leo can leave, he is ambushed by Agent Smith. He stands his ground and eventually defeats Smith, but flees when the Agent possesses another government body.

As Leo runs through the city toward another blog exit, he is pursued by the IRS Agents while “Liberal Sentinel” machines converge on the blogspot.com position in the real world. Leo reaches an exit, but he is ambushed by Agent Smith and his blog is compromised. In the real world, TerryK whispers to Leo that she was told by the oracle that she would fall in love with “the One”, implying that this is Leo. She refuses to accept his death and kisses him. Leo’s heart beats again, and within the Stimulus Matrix, Leo revives; the IRS Agents shoot at him, but he writes in his blog and stops their fraud in mid-air. Leo is able to perceive the Stimulus Matrix as the streaming lines of earth green code it really is. Agent Smith makes a final attempt to kill him, but his blog  comments are effortlessly blocked, and Leo destroys him. The other two IRS Agents flee, and Leo returns to the real world in time for blogspot.com’s fact weapon to destroy the Liberal Sentinels that had already breached the conservative blog movement.

A short epilogue shows Leo back in the Matrix, writing blog comments promising that he will demonstrate to the people imprisoned in the Stimulus Matrix that “anything is possible”. He hangs up the phone and deletes his blog naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com. Will Leo free the people from the Stimulus Matrix? Only if he can restore his deleted wordpress blog and inform the people they are living in a simulated reality called the “stimulus matrix” created by obama.

Citizen Quo has kept some of the code that is able to bend the laws of propaganda and he will use it to publish the code, “Quo Warranto”, that can free people imprisoned in the obama stimulus matrix. This blog is a “red pill” that will free you from the stimulus matrix. It is a “safe exit” from the stimulus matrix of obama. When the “phone rings” answer it if you want to exit the stimulus matrix which is a simulated reality.

Leo or Neo was right. Quo Warranto can be used as a program to crash the simulated stimulus matrix obama has constructed with the help of his thugs from Chicago. Leo has “the gift” of manipulating the Matrix, but he is waiting for something, possibly his next life to file a Quo Warranto on behalf of himself or someone else.

Leo remember most people in the stimulus matrix don’t know they are in a vitural reality stimulus construct. A fake politically correct environment used to manipulate unsuspecting US citizens into believing everything is ok so they will rely on the federal government for everything including healthcare.

Leo don’t let the raven tell you “nevermore”. Don’t give up on America.

what-happened-to-miss-ticklys-blog/

The man child president barack obama

Posted in The Man/Child Barack H. Obama with tags on December 3, 2009 by citizenquo

Conservative Talk Show host blasts Barack Obama as being the “Man-Child President”. Rush states that Obama is immature and that he is a child.

“He has a five minute career. He was in the senate for 150 days. He was a community organizer in Chicago for however number of years. He really has no experience running anything. I think he has got an out of this world ego. I think he is very narcissistic. He’s able to focus all attention on him all the time.”

“He is immature, inexperienced and in over his head.”
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………
I agree Rush obama is a “man child”. This term as it is applied here does not refer to a child being born a male. It is referring to a man who has the mind of a child or Adolescent. Obama is an immature male. A person who lacks the ability to think and perform as a mature adult. Every aspect of obama’s personality is controlled by his “inner” child. This is why he has made so many immature quotes. This accounts for his Indecision and lack of leadership. Obama depends on others to “lead” him to the teleprompter so he will appear to be a mature adult. In fact obama is retarded. His emotional growth is stunted. Obama emotionally in his teens or early 20’s.

Obama still has the emotions of a kid. That’s not a compliment. His mood can change on a dime, and he doesn’t seem to have much control over his feelings. And while people may put up with your antics, they truly don’t like them! Obama needs to grow up and take responsibility for how he acts.

………………………………………………………………………………………………………
How Emotionally Mature Is Obama? Answer The Questions for Obama And See If He Could Answer Yes To Any Of Thses Questions
………………………………………………………………………………………………………

  • Answer Yes to all that apply to Obama.
  • You know that jealousy only harms your relationships, and you are able to avoid it.
  • You are can deal with anxiety easily and quickly.
  • You believe that changing other people is futile – you only try to change yourself.
  • You know that you’re not perfect, and you’re totally okay with your flaws.
  • It’s easy for you to love someone.
  • When you encounter a problem, you try to solve it quickly. Thinking about it only makes it worse.
  • Rejections in your life have definitely hurt, but you have always been able to move on from them quickly.
  • You are a very honest person. You have principles that you live by.
  • You enjoy giving more than receiving.
  • When you are angry with someone, you don’t hold on to your anger. You make your feelings known and then move on.

Obama would not be able to answer yes to any of these questions.  If he could answer yes to a few his maturity level would rise.  Therefore his maturity level is lower than a normal adult. Obama is not a normal mature adult.  Obama is a man/child.  Obama is retarded.  Obama is a threat to all America because obama is “stuck on stupid” so to speak.

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Adolescents typically think in concrete ways, meaning they have difficulty with abstract and symbolic concepts. Their thinking tends to be focused on the present. They are just beginning to be able to gather information from experience, analyze information, and make critical decisions about future choices and consequences.

Cognitive development. Teens gradually develop the ability to think in more sophisticated, abstract ways—perceiving issues in shades of gray instead of black and white, and gaining a better understanding of concepts like morality, consequence, objectivity, and empathy. It can sometimes be difficult to deal with teens during this time because, although they understand that others have differing viewpoints, they often firmly believe their perception is the most true or valid.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

This study compares the responses of 58 adolescent and 58 adult school leaders on the Leadership Traits Inventory. Adolescent leaders rank integrity, good listening, and knowledge or skills highest and rank compassion, consistency, and flexibility lowest. Adult leaders, in comparison, rank sense of purpose, integrity, and knowledge or skills highest and rank flexibility, compassion, and creativity lowest. Rank-order differences between the groups are significant. Adolescent leaders rank good listening and creativity significantly higher than adult leaders. Adults rank sense of purpose, consistency, and flexibility significantly higher than adolescents.  The results are viewed in terms of leadership qualities, gender, and the developmental differences between adolescents and adults.

Obama has no integrity.  Obama has no consistency.   Obama has little to no creativity.  Obama has little to no compassion.  Obama’s flexibility can be compared to the scarecrow in the wizard of oz.  Obama has little to no knowledge or skill except community organizing.  Obama listens but can’t comprehend or act on what his generals tell him etc.

Obama is an adolescent leader.  A man/child as Rush explains. This is why obama has failed at every turn.

…………………………………………………………………………………………..

Moving Forward… (And Moved Off the Map It seems) Correction Leo Is Still In The Game!

Posted in Uncategorized with tags on December 2, 2009 by citizenquo

I guess Leo moved so forward he moved himself off the map. This is from google cache. Leo’s blog has been deleted except for 1 page but I have preserved some of his excellent work for future reference. Some links don’t work.

BULLETIN:

Leo is back in a BIG way along with Steven Pidgeon WOW!! The game changer is still in the game! See Link Below!

Leo Donofrio And Steve Pidgeon Have Joined Forces In New Lawsuits Including Quo Warranto

Moving Forward…

I am speaking with various parties who I may provide legal counsel to in the near future. This will require a period of silence from me. The time for legal talk is now over. The time for legal action has begun. Talk is cheap. I’m tired of it. Either litigation will commence or you won’t hear from me again via this blog.

This blog contains all the tools necessary for people to gain access to information from Hawaii. The UIPA is a very good law providing standing and expedited calendar service to “any person”. Study that law and use it. Request the media and legislature use it as well. They won’t. You know that. But put it in their face anyway.

I will report back here when I have something of significance to say regarding litigation.

For now, I will leave you with one salient point made by the DOJ in the hearing before Judge Carter:

“It’s the way the founding fathers intended.”

Page 15 of the transcript.

Since the DOJ is stipulating that the intention of the founding fathers is the proper guideline for this issue, then we ought to hold them to that position all the way down the line. The definition of “natural born citizen” as understood by the founding fathers is certainly the only definition which is legal under Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5. Barney Frank can’t change that and neither can law professors like Tribe and Dershowitz, etc.

As the DOJ has correctly indicated, the only definition of natural born citizen that matters is the one held by the founding fathers.

And that’s why everyone needs to read pages 43-44 of the transcript where Judge Carter indicates that even if Obama were born in Kenya, the Judge would not be comfortable in holding that Obama was not eligible to be POTUS.

Somebody needs to tell this Judge that the law in the US at the time of Obama’s birth stated quite clearly that Obama would not have qualified for US citizenship in 1961 if born in Kenya to Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Hussein Obama Sr. That’s very clear according federal law in 1961. If he wasn’t a citizen, how could he be a “natural born citizen”?

So, if you think Judge Carter is going to decide the British birth issue in favor of holding Obama ineligible if born in Hawaii, then you are really kidding yourselves. This case has no chance at all.

I don’t believe Obama was born in Kenya. I believe he was born in Hawaii. But I also believe that the state of Hawaii has been playing fast and loose with their own public disclosure laws and that they should not be trusted, especially since they haven’t been put under oath.

I also don’t believe it would have mattered to the founding fathers if Obama was born in Hawaii since he was a British citizen at birth, and the founding fathers had just fought a bloody war to rid themselves of British influence. To assume they would have allowed a British citizen at birth to become Commander In Chief of the US armed forces is to disgrace the blood of the patriots who earned this nation’s freedoms and liberties by their very lives.

For all intents and purposes, the “natural born citizen” safeguard given to this nation by the founding fathers is dead. And the entire Constitution is also dying by a cancer attacking all organs. It will only survive a certain death by miracle. Pray for such a miracle. It is truly your only hope.

Leo C. Donofrio

The Holy Grail of POTUS Eligibility Law Review Articles: Mr. Obama and Mr. Arthur… Meet Attorney George Collins

Posted in Uncategorized with tags on December 2, 2009 by citizenquo

Saved for future reference from google cache. Links don’t work. Leo has deleted this information from his blog but it was still in the google cache as of Dec 3, 2009.

The Holy Grail of POTUS Eligibility Law Review Articles: Mr. Obama and Mr. Arthur… Meet Attorney George Collins

Rarely, when conducting legal research does one find a historical document that is directly on point. But even more rare is to find a document which is directly on point multiple times. But that’s exactly what has happened this week. A historical document which destroys every bogus point being made by Obama POTUS eligibility supporters was recently discovered by a cracker jack team of university students from UCONN. They call themselves UNDEAD REVOLUTION.

They have been sending me good stuff for quite a while now. A wonderful contributor to comments at this blog – Kamira – is part of that team. This group is preparing the mother of all natural born citizen research reports based upon their unique historical document discoveries. It will be guest blogged by them right here when it’s ready for public consumption.

But for now, and as a lead in to their work, I offer you one of their superb historical finds. It’s an article from The American Law Review dated Sept./Oct. 1884. The American Law Review was a premier legal journal – the brain child of Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendel Holmes.

owh

This was not a law school publication. It was considered to be the state of legal art which utilized the most esteemed attorneys of the period.

The article I am about to show you was published in The American Law Review, written by George D. Collins, Esq. Attorney Collins was the Secretary of the California Bar Association. His name was recognized nationally for cases in the federal courts and moreso due to his regular publishing of articles via The American Law review.

The article I am excited to bring you is titled:

ARE PERSONS BORN IN THE UNITED STATES IPSO FACTO CITIZENS THEREOF?

The article provides historical opposition for every single point raised by Obama eligibility pundits and destroys all propaganda in its path.

The article is written in a clear and concise manner, easily understood by lawyers and lay persons alike. I will now introduce each relevant issue confronted in this article and then present the article in full for your review.

OBAMA POTUS ELIGIBILITY MYTHS DESTROYED BY MR. GEORGE COLLINS

MYTH #1: Chester Arthur’s British birth was known and accepted by the American people.

This article was written in Summer 1884, while Chester Arthur was still President. Since The American Law Review was such an esteemed legal publication, old Chester must have been somewhat intimidated by the report of Mr. Collins. This is because the article makes perfectly clear that to be a natural born citizen one must have been born to a US citizen father.

Chester’s father William was not naturalized until 1843, 14 years after Chester was born. This meant that Chester Arthur was a British subject at birth and was therefore not eligible to be President as was first reported at this blog back in December 2008.

It has been argued that Chester Arthur’s occupation of the White House set a legal precedent for Obama since both Chester and Barack were born of British fathers. But the public – at the time Chester was running for VP and later when he became POTUS – never knew that Chester Arthur was a British subject since he successfully lied to the public about his parental heritage.

The law review article goes into great detail concerning the issue of who exactly rises to the level of natural born citizen. It discusses law cases and legal precedent in its analysis, but it does not even mention the current President – Chester Arthur – even though Attorney Collins steadfastly denies that a person born on US soil to an alien father could be a natural born citizen.

If Attorney Collins – esteemed lawyer, Secretary of the Bar Association and nationally known legal journalist – had thought his current President at the time this article was published – Chester Arthur – was a British subject at birth, then the article would have required a discussion of that point.

But the article does not mention President Chester Arthur because Chester Arthur managed – through blatant deceit – to cover that issue up. He successfully concealed his British birth from the American people. This law review article is proof of that conclusion.

MYTH #2: Lynch v. Clark ( a New York State case, not federal) is legal precedent for Obama to be considered a natural born citizen.

Despite the fact that state court cases have absolutely no legal weight of authority in federal court, Obama eligibility supporters cite this case often. Attorney Collins tears the decision to shreds and exposes its faulty conclusions.

MYTH #3: Common law states that being born on the soil – Jus Soli – makes one a “natural born subject” and therefore every person born on US soil is a “natural born citizen”.

Attorney Collins takes this on directly and establishes clearly that there is no common law in the United States. He also explains that natural born citizens are in no way, shape or form, the same as natural born subjects.

MYTH #4: Vattell’s definition of a natural born citizen was not considered by the framers.

Attorney Collins discusses Vattel in great detail. And Collins agrees that to be a natural born citizen one must be born on the soil of parents who were themselves citizens. Collins quotes Vattell.

But more important is the fact that Collins makes it clear Vattel’s definition of “natural born citizen” was not actually Vattel’s definition.

This is very important.

The definition of “natural born citizen” was not created by Vattel in his treatise, “Law of Nations.” That treatise simply discussed the established body of law known as “the law of nations”. The definition of natural born citizen discussed in Vattel’s treatise was actually the definition established by the body of law known as “law of nations”.

Attorney Collins makes all of this quite clear in the article below. Now please review Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution:

The Congress shall have power…To define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the Law of Nations;

The capital letters are not in reference to Vattel’s treatise, but they are in reference to the body of law Vattel wrote about – the actual “law of nations”. And that body of law – according to Attorney Collins as well as Vattell – held that a “natural born citizen” was somebody with connections to the nation for having been born on the soil as well as having been born of citizen parents. In Article 1, Section 8, we therefore have a direct recognition that the framers respected the law of nations.

DOUBLE ALLEGIANCE TO THE NATION

This is what the framers required for the Commander In Chief. Any child of immigrants from any nation could become President – as long as his parents became naturalized US citizens before that child was born on US soil. In their wisdom, the framers sought two generations of US citizenship. This discriminates against no race at all.

To be an American has nothing to do with race. It has to do with being a person cloaked in liberty – free from monarchy, free of repression, free forever.

The natural born citizen clause does not establish a superior form of citizenship. It does establish a national security safeguard against foreign invasion of the White House and takeover of the US Armed Forces.

It makes all the sense in the world that the person who holds the keys to the massive nuclear arsenal in our possession should be born on US soil to parents who were citizens.

If we allow persons born in the US of alien fathers to be President of the US then Kim Jong Il, Osama Bin Laden and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad are all eligible to have their direct offspring become President of the United States and Commander In Chief of our Armed Forces.

That is what you are saying if you think Obama is eligible to be President.

You can’t discriminate based on race or nationality in this country. If a person whose father was not a US citizen at the time of his birth can become President, then it doesn’t matter what nation that person is a dual citizen of.

This is the main issue and main reason why I have dedicated so much of my time to this situation. I am no more worried about Obama than I was about Bush or Clinton. I see all of them as having struck horrific blows against US sovereignty. But I am seriously worried about who comes next. Who is being groomed as a Manchurian candidate as we speak?

If Obama is eligible to be President, then the sons of every despicable despot are also eligible.

It’s not like North Korea, Saudi Arabia or Iran are going to let the sons of US citizens lead their countries anytime soon. Are we really going to allow their sons to lead our nation? The framers would never have allowed such a horrific situation to exist. With the natural born citizen clause they protected us against this very scenario. We must protect the protection.

A legal fraud is being perpetrated upon this nation through ridicule and straight up major media propaganda.

The great weight of authority indicates Obama is not eligible to be President, but we are losing the PR war.

I recognize arguments which take issue with some of the conclusions below. But the point is urgently made that this issue is not settled and has never been directly adjudicated by a federal court. Such adjudication is the necessary outcome of this debate.

I hope the following piece of history serves as a wake up call to the snarky sarcasm being leveled at this very serious legal question. There is nothing funny about this issue. The repercussions for generations to come are potentially disastrous.

And with that I leave you with the Holy Grail of all natural born citizen law review articles:

Are Persons Born Within the United States Ipso Facto Citizens Thereof – George D. Collins

“NATURAL BORN CITIZEN”: DEFINED BY 14TH AMENDMENT FRAMERS AND IN TREATISE RELIED ON BY SCALIA

Posted in Uncategorized with tags on December 2, 2009 by citizenquo

Saved from google cache for all who believed in what Leo was doing. Links don’t work. This is for future reference and study. It is well worth preserving although Leo didn’t think so.

“NATURAL BORN CITIZEN”: DEFINED BY 14TH AMENDMENT FRAMERS AND IN TREATISE RELIED ON BY SCALIA

PREAMBLE

This week has been quite enlightening as to the blatantly obvious fact that our “Fourth Estate” press corps have been transmogrified into propaganda ponies polly wanna crackering whatever may be handed down to them from “The One Corporation – your source for everything…” (cue eery theme tune). They don’t report the news anymore. No. Now they tell you what they want the news to be. There’s a huge difference.

For the record, my law suit was brought to remove three candidates from the ballots – three candidates who have big Constitutional issues as to their eligibility.

At the time of his birth, Obama was a British/Kenyan citizen by descent of his father. Because I pointed out pesky international laws which governed his citizenship due to the fact that a father has every legal right in the world to have the laws of his nation apply to his son, I have been labeled a conspiracy freakoid of nature.

Never mind that I included demands for Panama John McCain and the Nicaraguan born Roger Calero to also be removed from our ballots. No, they don’t want to talk about that do they – because it would blow the “he’s just another Obama hater” mantra clear out of play.

A citizen (me) raised the Constitutional issue of first impression as to the meaning of “natural born Citizen” in Article 2, Section 1, of the United States Constitution – that ultimate pesky legal document for those who would rather “be” the law instead of following it.

What are the Fourth Estate propagandists worried about? Thou doth protest too much. Me thinks so. Why? Because the law is against their man – it indicates Barack Obama is not a natural born Citizen of the United States. And most of the media pundits have basically agreed by default. I say this because when yelling and mocking the issue, their main argument is not that the law is on their side (they know it isn’t), but rather that the law shouldn’t be discussed at all.

PRESIDENTIAL PRECEDENT

Other than the fraud perpetrated by Chester Arthur (see prior stories), every post grandfather clause President of this nation was born in the United States to parents who were US Citizens. In their wisdom, they recognized the danger in having people born under the jurisdiction of another country taking the role of commander in chief.

They did this recognizing that multitudes of loyal men wouldn’t be eligible, but they also knew that they couldn’t see into the soul of all possible candidates, so just to be safe, they put a restriction in the Document which is there to protect us from a sneak attack in the oval office by somebody who might have loyalty to another nation. The framers themselves were good men, loyal to this infant nation, but they recognized that people like them had to be excluded from future Presidential eligibility as an order of protection. McCain and Obama know that.

And in my stay application, I never accused either man of disloyalty. Quite the opposite. Had any of these morose media maniacs actually read the papers I filed with the United States Supreme Court (before election day), this is what they would have found as to Barack Obama:

As regarding the issues surrounding Senator Obama’s birth certificate, and if it may please this Honorable Court, I would point out that Senator Obama has not been presented with a genuine legal request from a party with proper standing to command him in any way, and therefore he has no legal responsibility to submit or to bend his integrity. And for that, he certainly deserves respect.

Appellant believes that if Senator Obama is presented with a legal request from a government authority sanctioned to make such request, that Senator Obama will respond accordingly and put this issue behind him forever.

That being said, petitioner regretfully submits that since candidate Obama was born to a Kenyan father, he also is not eligible to the office of President since he is not a “natural born citizen” by the Constitution.

As to John McCain they would have found this:

Senator John McCain is an American patriot who has valiantly suffered more for this country than most of us ever will. He has shown bravery beyond that which the country has any right to ask, and it is with very deep and sincere regret that I respectfully request that this Honorable Court order the Secretaries of the several States to remove John McCain’s name from the ballots.

I couldn’t have shown the candidates more respect. But both of them should have known that if either were to become President – despite the loyalty they have for this country – the dam would be broken and the waters of foreign influence would be forever capable of drowning our national sovereignty and placing our military in the hands of enemies from within.

IT’S NOT ABOUT OBAMA OR McCAIN – IT’S ABOUT WHO COMES NEXT. THEY SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT AND FALLEN ON THEIR PRESIDENTIAL SWORDS TO PROTECT THIS COUNTRY.

The truly patriotic thing for both to do was pass the baton to another worthy candidate not burdened with eligibility issues. I understand the lure of being President and all the power, glory, responsibility and possibility for enlightening change that entails. But the precedent to be set is fraught with danger. And the candidates knew that.

I suppose they’ve taken a view that the good they might bring to our Country far outweighs any risk from who may come next. But knowing the slippery slope of history, only hubris could make such a call.

OBAMA’S ADMISSION

Like it or not, rich or poor, great or strong, Democrat or Republican, Obama was born under the jurisdiction of Great Britain via Kenya. There is nothing conspiratorial about saying that. Obama has it posted on his own web site. It’s this very definition which I included in Cort’s Wrotnowski’s brief. Here’s what it says at Obama’s web portal, Fight The Smears:

When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children. (Emphasis added.)

There it is. Obama is telling you his status was “governed” by a foreign jurisdiction. This is no theory. This is a fact.

I have always believed Obama was born in Hawaii. I told numerous reporters that there was no way in hell Obama would post a fraudulent birth certificate at his web site. I said that over and over, but they’re still lying about my position. Why not tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth? Is the truth now part of a conspiracy?

Instead of recognizing that a legitimate legal nexus exists for Obama’s eligibility to be questioned, the great bulk of main stream media outlets have pulled out all the stops to mock, attack, accuse, hate and discredit anybody willing to consider the law.

What have we come to?

The opposing media argument concerns the will of the people in the election and that the Supreme Court shouldn’t overturn the intent of 65 million voters. It’s an argument that fails – if the candidates were not Constitutionally eligible then the election was a fraud no matter how many voted for Obama.

My law suit was meant to return the election to the Constitution. It’s the Republican and Democratic parties that overturned the election stuffing two ineligible candidates down our throats with no regard whatsoever to the future precedent it would set.

The people are subservient to the Document and if we don’t keep it that way, we have plenty of historical examples throughout history detailing exactly what will happen to us if the Document is defeated.

Regardless, should the people demand that Constitutional restrictions in Article 2, Section 1, be removed from the Document, they can lobby their political representatives to introduce an amendment, and if such amendment were to be ratified by three-quarters of either the state legislatures, or of constitutional conventions specially elected in each of the states, then they can have any President they like.

But as long as Article 2, Section 1, is controlling law, it’s those who are trying to attack all review of it who are the conspiracy theorists. All I did was ask the Supreme Court to rule on an issue which has caused multiple law review articles to be written and countless news reports and blogs to be published. It has generally confused legal scholars for over two centuries.

“Ooh, look at that crazy conspiracy nut Donofrio,” they squawk. Me so crazy. Well, maybe I am a bit strange (Who the hell isn’t?) but not for my understanding of the natural born Citizen issue. And that’s the only issue before the Honorable Court.

That being said, let’s now take a look at two established and respected legal sources which define the term “natural born Citizen” as a person who is born in the United States to parents both of whom are “citizens”.

NATURAL BORN CITIZEN DEFINED THROUGH HISTORY

I could understand rabid attacks if the legal theory I was relying upon had been thoroughly discredited by a Supreme Court decision or by statute, or even by historical texts, but it’s quite the opposite. Beside 200 years of Presidential precedent, the great weight of authority supports the argument that Obama is not a natural born Citizen.

I understand the countering argument and I’ve welcomed debate of both sides of the issue in comments to this blog. But most of the published arguments on the natural born Citizen issue are recently published law review articles which haven’t done a very good job of presenting the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

THE FRAMERS OF THE 14TH AMENDMENT

Despite popular belief, the 14th Amendment does not convey the status of “natural born Citizen” in its text. It just conveys the status of “Citizen”. And it’s very clear that in the pre-amendment Constitution, the Framers made a distinction between a “Citizen” and a “natural born Citizen”. The requirement to be a Senator or Representative is “Citizen”, but the requirement to be President is “natural born Citizen”.

From the 14th Amendment:

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside.”

But even as to this conveyance of citizenship, those who were responsible for drafting the 14th Amendment made it clear that – to them – the meaning of “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” meant subject only to the jurisdiction thereof.

Dr. John Fonte, Senior Fellow of The Hudson Institute had this to say about the issue at a Congressional hearing on dual citizenship from September 29, 2005:

The authors in the legislative history, the authors of that language, Senator Lyman Trumbull said, ”When we talk about ’subject to the jurisdiction of the United States,’ it means complete jurisdiction, not owing allegiance to anybody else.” Senator Jacob Howard said that it’s ”a full and complete jurisdiction.”

This illustrates that Congress recently discussed the issue, and they can’t claim they were unaware. But we don’t have to take Dr. Fonte’s word for it. The following discussion by the various 14th Amendment Framers took place on the Senate floor. I took it from P.A. Madison’s research at http://www.14thamendment.us (use his link for footnotes):

It is clear the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment had no intention of freely giving away American citizenship to just anyone simply because they may have been born on American soil. Again, we are fortunate enough to have on the record the highest authority tell us, Sen. Lyman Trumbull, Chairman of the Judiciary Committee… and the one who inserted the phrase:

[T]he provision is, that ‘all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.’ That means ’subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.’ What do we mean by ‘complete jurisdiction thereof?’ Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means.

Then Madison quotes Sen. Howard, another Framer, concurring with Trumbull:

Sen. Howard concurs with Trumbull’s construction:

Mr. HOWARD: I concur entirely with the honorable Senator from Illinois [Trumbull], in holding that the word “jurisdiction,” as here employed, ought to be construed so as to imply a full and complete jurisdiction on the part of the United States, whether exercised by Congress, by the executive, or by the judicial department; that is to say, the same jurisdiction in extent and quality as applies to every citizen of the United States now.[3]

Mr. Madison continues with even more proof of what the 14th Amendment Framers meant:

Sen. Johnson, speaking on the Senate floor, offers his comments and understanding of the proposed new amendment to the constitution:

[Now], all this amendment [citizenship clause] provides is, that all persons born in the United States and not subject to some foreign Power–for that, no doubt, is the meaning of the committee who have brought the matter before us–shall be considered as citizens of the United States. That would seem to be not only a wise but a necessary provision. If there are to be citizens of the United States there should be some certain definition of what citizenship is, what has created the character of citizen as between himself and the United States, and the amendment says that citizenship may depend upon birth, and I know of no better way to give rise to citizenship than the fact of birth within the territory of the United States, born to parents who at the time were subject to the authority of the United States.[4]

No doubt in the Senate as to what the citizenship clause means as further evidenced by Sen. W. Williams:

In one sense, all persons born within the geographical limits of the United States are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States…All persons living within a judicial district may be said, in one sense, to be subject to the jurisdiction of the court in that district, but they are not in every sense subject to the jurisdiction of the court until they are brought, by proper process, within the reach of the power of the court. I understand the words here, ’subject to the jurisdiction of the United States,’ to mean fully and completely subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.[5]

Madison saves for last the greatest authority on the issue:

Rep. John Bingham of Ohio, considered the father of the Fourteenth Amendment, confirms the understanding and construction the framers used in regards to birthright and jurisdiction while speaking on civil rights of citizens in the House on March 9, 1866:

[I] find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen…[6]

It’s important to note this statement was issued by Bingham only months before the 14th Amendment was proposed.

In conclusion, I would like to thank reader “John Boy” for pointing to Justice Scalia’s opinion in District of Columbia Et Al. v. Heller. In that case, Justice Scalia took into consideration a certain historical legal reference:

The common references to those “fit to bear arms” in congressional discussions about the militia are matched by use of the same phrase in the few nonmilitary federal contexts where the concept would be relevant… Other legal sources frequently used “bear arms” in nonmilitary contexts.10

Now look at “footnote 10″:

E. de Vattel, The Law of Nations, or, Principles of the Law of Nature 144 (1792) (“Since custom has allowed persons of rank and gentlemen of the army to bear arms in time of peace, strict care should be taken that none but these should be allowed to wear swords”);

Since Justice Scalia cited to this legal textbook in March of 2008, it’s not outrageous to think he might also refer to “The Laws of Nations” on the natural born Citizen issue?

I’ll leave you now with the relevant textbook definition of natural born citizen. The following was published in 1758. This definition, added to all of the above, certainly establishes a rational legal basis to hold that Barack Obama is not a natural born Citizen. And more than that, it puts the burden on those who deny it to don the tin foil hat of despair and bring forthwith to the table of honest debate their own bed of authority to lie in:
§ 212. Citizens and natives.

The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.

(Leo this good work has been preserved for future study of those who believed in you past efforts.)